During a debate in parliament, Neale Hanvey, Member of Parliament (“MP”) for Kirkcaldy and Cowdenbeath, noted that mRNA injections had been found to be contaminated with plasmid DNA and contained cancer-causing SV40.
“The loss of trust in big pharma is substantial,” he said, “I will never accept another mRNA vaccine, and I am far from alone.”
On Thursday, the UK House of Commons debated a motion put forward by Andrew Bridgen MP for the Covid Inquiry to open its Module 4 on the safety and efficacy of the experimental covid-19 injections as soon as possible.
During the debate, Mr. Hanvey gave a speech. Including several interventions, his speech concluded after 30 minutes. Towards the end of his speech, he raised the issue of DNA contamination of mRNA injections.
Quoting an article published by The Spectator Australia on 23 September 2023, Mr. Hanvey said how genomics scientist Kevin McKernan accidentally discovered that vials of mRNA Pfizer and Moderna Covid vaccines were contaminated with tiny fragments of plasmid DNA. McKernan’s revelations were soon dubbed #PlasmidGate as other scientists confirmed his findings.
For those who may be interested, we have attached a copy of The Spectator Australia’s article below.
Mr. Hanvey immediately followed his remark about plasmid DNA contamination by noting Professor Angus Dalgleish’s concerns:
Professor Angus Dalgleish [ ] noted that the contaminant, simian virus 40, is: “a sequence that is ‘used to drive DNA into the nucleus, especially in gene therapies’ and that this is ‘something that regulatory agencies around the world have specifically said is not possible with the mRNA vaccines’. These SV40 promotors are also well recognised as being oncogenic” – or cancer-inducing genetic material.
Professor Dalgleish further notes: “To put it bluntly, this means that they are not vaccines at all but a … Genetically Modified Organism that should have been subject to totally different regulatory conditions and certainly not be classed as vaccines.”
Oncologists worldwide have contacted Professor Dalgleish with the consensus that this may be causing relapses in melanoma, lymphoma, leukaemia and kidney cancers, Mr. Hanvey told the House.
[Prof. Dalgleish] concludes with the following warning: “To advise booster vaccines, as is the current case, is no more and no less than medical incompetence; to continue to do so” – with his cited evidence – “is medical negligence which can carry a custodial sentence.”
Mr. Hanvey was quoting from a September 2023 article written by Prof. Dalgleish. As Mr. Hanvey noted, he concluded that article by saying: “No ifs or buts any longer. All mRNA vaccines must be halted and banned now.”
Mr. Hanvey asked Maria Caulfield, MP for Lewes and Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health and Social Care: “Are big pharma being exempted from liability and, if so, why?”
At the beginning of his speech, Mr. Harvey had said that he and his family had received two vaccines and a booster, as was the case for many others in the Chamber.
“The loss of trust in big pharma is substantial,” he said, “I will never accept another mRNA vaccine, and I am far from alone.”
Although Caulfield gave a fairly lengthy response to the debate as a whole, she did not respond to Mr. Hanvey’s question about the liability of big pharma.
Below is a short excerpt from Mr. Hanvey’s speech. You can watch the full two-and-a-half-hour debate HERE and read a transcript in Hansard HERE. In the video on Parliament.TV, Mr. Hanvey’s speech begins at timestamp 15:59. In Hansard, his speech begins HERE and the text relating to the clip below begins at around the Column 531 mark.
